Cycling and Female Sexual and Urinary Function: Results From a Large, Multinational, Cross-Sectional Study

19Citations
Citations of this article
115Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Bicycle riding has become an increasingly popular mode of transportation and exercise, especially among women, and previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between cycling and sexual dysfunction, albeit using non-validated questionnaires. Aim: We aimed to explore the relationship between cycling and sexual and urinary dysfunction. Methods: Cyclists were recruited to complete a survey through Facebook advertisements and outreach to sporting clubs across 5 English-speaking countries. Swimmers and runners were recruited as a comparison group. Outcomes: Participants were queried using validated questionnaires, including the Female Sexual Function Index, the American Urological Association Symptom Index, and non-validated questions about history of urinary tract infections (UTIs), genital numbness, and genital saddle sores (all self-reported). Results: 3,118 (53.3%) Women completed the survey, comprising 1,053 (34%) non-cyclists, 1,656 (53%) low-intensity cyclists, and 409 (13%) high-intensity cyclists. After adjusting for age, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, ischemic heart disease, tobacco use, race, marital status, urinary symptoms, and sexual activity, high-intensity cyclists had lower odds of self-reported sexual dysfunction compared to non-cyclists (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.7, P =.02). There were no statistically significant differences in urinary symptoms across groups. Compared to non-cyclists, both low- and high-intensity cyclists had higher odds of reporting a previous UTI (aOR 1.4, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gaither, T. W., Awad, M. A., Murphy, G. P., Metzler, I., Sanford, T., Eisenberg, M. L., … Breyer, B. N. (2018). Cycling and Female Sexual and Urinary Function: Results From a Large, Multinational, Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 15(4), 510–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.02.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free