Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate, from a longitudinal perspective, how WHO communicated COVID-19 related information to the public through its press conferences during the first two years of the pandemic. Methods The transcripts of 195 WHO COVID-19 press conferences held between January 22, 2020 and February 23, 2022 were collected. All transcripts were syntactically parsed to extract highly frequent noun chunks that were potential topics of the press conferences. First-order autoregression models were fit to identify “hot” and “cold” topics. In addition, sentiments and emotions expressed in the transcripts were analyzed using lexicon-based sentiment/emotion analyses. Mann-Kendall tests were performed to capture the possible trends of sentiments and emotions over time. Results First, eleven “hot” topics were identified. These topics were pertinent to anti-pandemic measures, disease surveillance and development, and vaccine-related issues. Second, no significant trend was captured in sentiments. Last, significant downward trends were found in anticipation, surprise, anger, disgust, and fear. However, no significant trends were found in joy, trust, and sadness. Conclusions This retrospective study provided new empirical evidence on how WHO communicated issues pertaining to COVID-19 to the general public through its press conferences. With the help of the study, members of the general public, health organizations, and other stakeholders will be able to better understand the way in which WHO has responded to various critical events during the first two years of the pandemic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

He, S., Li, D., Liu, C. H., Xiong, Y., Liu, D., Feng, J., & Wen, J. (2023). Crisis communication in the WHO COVID-19 press conferences: A retrospective analysis. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 18). Public Library of Science. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0282855

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free