Comparision of ici 35868, etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia

23Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The anaesthetic properties and side-effects of propofol 1.5 mg kg -1etomidate 0.2 mg kg -1and methohexitone 1.5 mg kg-1were compared in 71 healthy female patients undergoing short gynaecological procedures. Propofol proved to be a safe and effective agent for induction and maintenance of anaesthesia and was associated with a lower incidence of side-effects than either etomidate or methohexitone. © 1985 British Journal of Anaesthesia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wells, J. K. G. (1985). Comparision of ici 35868, etomidate and methohexitone for day-case anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 57(8), 732–735. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/57.8.732

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free