Quality of life (QOL) evaluation of patients in a phase 3 study comparing NEPA with an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

  • Zhang L
  • Lu S
  • Feng J
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Suboptimal CINV prevention can negatively impact patients' (pts) QOL by interfering with daily functioning. Antiemetic guidelines recommend coadministration of a NK1 receptor antagonist (RA)/5‐HT3RA/corticosteroid to optimize CINV control in pts at high risk for CINV. NEPA, a fixed combination of the NK1RA netupitant and 5‐HT3RA palonosetron (PALO) has shown superior CINV prevention and improvement in QOL over PALO. A single dose of NEPA recently showed noninferiority to a 3‐day aprepitant/granisetron (APR/GRAN) regimen in preventing CINV in the first head‐to‐head comparison of NK1RA‐containing regimens. The impact of CINV on pts' QOL in this study was explored. Methods: This randomized, double‐blind, Phase 3 study in chemotherapy‐naïve pts receiving cisplatin‐based chemotherapy (CT) assessed the non‐inferiority of NEPA versus APR/GRAN for complete response (CR: no emesis/no rescue medication [RM]) rates during the overall (0‐120 h) phase post‐CT. All pts received dexamethasone on days 1‐4. Secondary endpoints included proportion of pts with no emesis, no significant nausea (NSN: <25mmon 100mm VAS), no RMuse, and no impact on daily life (NIDL) as assessed by the Functional Living Index‐Emesis (FLIE), comprised of vomiting‐ and nausea‐specific questions/domains. The Cochran‐Mantel‐Haenszel test was used for between group comparisons; non‐inferiority testing was not done for secondary endpoints. Results: Treatment groups were similar for the 828 pts analyzed: male (71%); mean age 55 years; lung cancer (58%). NIDL rates were higher for NEPA, particularly during the delayed phase; similar results were seen for no emesis, NSN, and noRM. Conclusions: In this first study comparing NK1RA regimens, NEPA administered only on day 1 was numerically similar to a 3‐day oral APR/GRAN regimen in maintaining functional status in patients receiving highly emetogenic CT.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, L., Lu, S., Feng, J., Dechaphunkul, A., Chessari, S., Lanzarotti, C., … Aapro, M. (2017). Quality of life (QOL) evaluation of patients in a phase 3 study comparing NEPA with an aprepitant regimen for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Annals of Oncology, 28, v545–v546. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdx388.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free