Abstract
Wikis, a popular tool for sharing knowledge, are basically collaborative editing systems. However, existing wiki systems offer limited support for co-operative authoring, and they do not scale well, because they are based on a centralised architecture. This paper compares the well-known centralised Media Wiki system with several peer-to-peer approaches to editing of wiki pages: an operational transformation approach (MOT2), a commutativity-oriented approach (WOOTO) and a conflict resolution approach (ACF). We evaluate and compare them, according to a number of qualitative and quantitative metrics.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ignat, C. L., Oster, G., Molli, P., Cart, M., Ferrié, J., Kermarrec, A. M., … Guerraoui, R. (2007). A comparison of optimistic approaches to collaborative editing of wiki pages. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Collaborative Computing: Networking, Applications and Worksharing, CollaborateCom 2007 (pp. 474–483). https://doi.org/10.1109/COLCOM.2007.4553878
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
