The five deadly sins of science publishing

  • Tracz V
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Science cannot progress without scientists reporting their findings. And yet researchers have given control of this central pillar of the scientific process to science publishers, who are in the business of serving the interests of their journals; these are not always the same as the interests of science. This editorial describes the problems with the process of preparing and publishing research findings, and with judging their veracity and significance, and then explains how we at Faculty of 1000 are starting to tackle the ‘deadly sins’ of science publishing.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tracz, V. (2015). The five deadly sins of science publishing. F1000Research, 4, 112. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.6488.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free