Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012

  • Ramirez Fernandez M
  • Salmeron Silvera J
  • López Meneses E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
77Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

© by FUOC, 2015.Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have emerged in informative and scientific literature as a revolution with great potential within the educational and training world. However, at the same time, there are discrepancies and questions about the pedagogical value and scope that this movement has on higher education. Therefore, the MOOC universe is the object of educational consideration among various authors and institutions in the globalised world, but some dimensions and implications of their evaluation still need to be assessed and analysed from different perspectives.In this paper, we introduce a comparative overview of the quality indicators of two instruments for assessing MOOCs: Standard UNE 66181:2012 on quality management for virtual teaching, and the training analysis instrument for teaching models and strategies of online university courses (ADECUR). Lastly, we will introduce the development of a tool for assessing the quality of MOOCs based on the strengths of the two instruments examined.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ramirez Fernandez, M. B., Salmeron Silvera, J. L., & López Meneses, E. (2015). Comparative between quality assessment tools for MOOCs: ADECUR vs Standard UNE 66181: 2012. RUSC. Universities and Knowledge Society Journal, 12(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.7238/rusc.v12i1.2258

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free