Fresh porcine cardiac valves are not rejected in primates

25Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Transplanted porcine hearts are hyperacutely rejected by human immunoglobulin M antibodies against a porcine vascular endothelial molecule, galactose α-1,3-galactose, with ensuing human complement activation and membrane attack complex deposition. It is unclear, however, whether porcine valve endothelium triggers a similar immune response. We sought to investigate whether fresh porcine valves implanted into primates are rejected. Methods: Wild-type porcine hearts before (n = 6) and after (n = 3) heterotopic transplantation into baboons underwent sectioning and were examined by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry for galactose α-1,3-galactose, primate immunoglobulin M, and membrane attack complex. Results: Examination of untransplanted porcine hearts showed that although cardiac microvascular endothelium strongly expressed the galactose α-1,3-galactose antigen, galactose α-1,3-galactose was not detected on the endothelium of porcine aortic and pulmonary valves. Porcine hearts transplanted into baboon recipients were hyperacutely rejected 60 to 80 minutes after implantation. Despite dramatic tissue damage associated with extensive immunoglobulin M and membrane attack complex binding on the microvascular endothelium, the aortic and pulmonary valves were entirely spared. Valves remained morphologically intact at explant and showed no signs of immunoglobulin M- and membrane attack complex-mediated damage. Conclusions: The absence of galactose α-1,3-galactose expression may protect unfixed porcine valves from xenograft rejection in primates. Further investigation of viable porcine valves appears warranted.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, R. H., Kadner, A., Mitchell, R. N., & Adams, D. H. (2000). Fresh porcine cardiac valves are not rejected in primates. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 119(6), 1216–1220. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2000.106526

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free