Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions

30Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss previous research in automatic prediction of court decisions. We define the difference between outcome identification, outcome-based judgement categorisation and outcome forecasting, and review how various studies fall into these categories. We discuss how important it is to understand the legal data that one works with in order to determine which task can be performed. Finally, we reflect on the needs of the legal discipline regarding the analysis of court judgements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medvedeva, M., Wieling, M., & Vols, M. (2023). Rethinking the field of automatic prediction of court decisions. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 31(1), 195–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-021-09306-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free