Indications for exchange or explantation of phakic implantable collamer lens with central port in patients with and without keratoconus

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

explantation in non-KC group were vault measurement, cataract formation, increased intraocular pressure, inaccurate refraction, and patient dissatisfaction in 22 (68.75%), 4 (12.5%), 3 (9.37%), 2 (6.25%), and 1 (3.12%) case, respectively. The most common indication for ICL exchange/explantation in the KC group was inaccurate vault sizing in 11 patients (78.57%), inaccurate refraction in 2 patients (14.28%), and patient dissatisfaction postoperatively in 1 (7.14%) case. CONCLUSION: ICL implantation results in predictable refractive outcomes over the long term with exchange/ explantation rates comparable to previous literature. Improper vault size is the most common cause of ICL exchange/explantation among patients with or without KC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alhamzah, A., Alharbi, S. S., Alfardan, F., Aldebasi, T., & Almudhaiyan, T. (2021). Indications for exchange or explantation of phakic implantable collamer lens with central port in patients with and without keratoconus. International Journal of Ophthalmology. International Journal of Ophthalmology (c/o Editorial Office). https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2021.11.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free