Robustness of the covariance matrix for galaxy clustering measurements

14Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present a study on the robustness of the covariance matrix estimation for galaxy clustering measurements depending on the cosmological parameters and galaxy bias. To this end, we have produced 9000 galaxy mock catalogues relying on the effective Zel'dovich approximation implemented in the EZmock computer code, using different input cosmological models and bias parameters. The reference catalogue has also been produced with this code, making our study insensitive to the approximation, at least on a relative-qualitative level. Our findings indicate that the covariance matrix is insensitive to the input power spectrum (e.g. different σ8), as long as the two- and three-point galaxy clustering measurements agree with the given data. In fact, the covariance matrix shows a bias at small scales (r ≲ 40 h -1 Mpc) when the chosen galaxy bias parameters yield three-point statistics, which is not compatible with the reference one within the error bars, even though the two-point statistics agree within 1 per cent. Nevertheless, the error becomes negligible at large scales, making the covariance matrix still reliable for data analysis using only measurements in that regime (e.g. measuring baryon acoustic oscillations). High precision in cosmological parameter estimation is expected for covariance matrices extracted from mock galaxy catalogues, which accurately take into account both the two- and three-point statistics. This is independent of whether this is achieved by using the right cosmology and galaxy bias (which are not a priori known) or just any combination of both fitting the net observed galaxy clustering.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumgarten, F., & Chuang, C. H. (2018). Robustness of the covariance matrix for galaxy clustering measurements. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 480(2), 2535–2543. https://doi.org/10.1093/MNRAS/STY1971

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free