Serosorting is associated with a decreased risk of HIV seroconversion in the EXPLORE study cohort

65Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Seroadaptation strategies such as serosorting and seropositioning originated within communities of men who have sex with men (MSM), but there are limited data about their effectiveness in preventing HIV transmission when utilized by HIV-negative men. Methodology/Principal Findings: Data from the EXPLORE cohort of HIV-negative MSM who reported both seroconcordant and serodiscordant partners were used to evaluate serosorting and seropositioning. The association of serosorting and seropositioning with HIV seroconversion was evaluated in this cohort of high risk MSM from six U.S. cities. Serosorting was independently associated with a small decrease in risk of HIV seroconversion (OR=0.88; 95%CI, 0.81-0.95), even among participants reporting $10 partners. Those who more consistently practiced serosorting were more likely to be white (p= 0.01), have completed college (p=,0.0002) and to have had 10 or more partners in the six months before the baseline visit (p=0.01) but did not differ in age, reporting HIV-infected partners, or drug use. There was no evidence of a seroconversion effect with seropositioning (OR 1.02, 95%CI, 0.92-1.14). Significance: In high risk HIV uninfected MSM who report unprotected anal intercourse with both seroconcordant and serodiscordant partners, serosorting was associated with a modest decreased risk of HIV infection. To maximize any potential benefit, it will be important to increase accurate knowledge of HIV status, through increased testing frequency, improved test technology, and continued development of strategies to increase disclosure. © 2010 Philip et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Philip, S. S., Yu, X., Donnell, D., Vittinghoff, E., & Buchbinder, S. (2010). Serosorting is associated with a decreased risk of HIV seroconversion in the EXPLORE study cohort. PLoS ONE, 5(9), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0012662

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free