Mpr and nlr as prognostic markers in icu-admitted patients with covid-19 in jazan, saudi arabia

8Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: The aims of the current study were to evaluate the importance of MPR and NLR as prognostic markers in ICU-admitted COVID-19 patients and to investigate the impact of COVID-19 on hematological and coagulation parameters in patients from Jazan region of Saudi Arabia. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between October 2020 and January 2021 at King Fahad Central Hospital, Jazan region. Medical files, which included the results of complete blood count (CBC), calculated mean platelet volume to platelet count ratio (MPR) and neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR) parameters, coagulation profile and D-dimer test, of 96 (64 male and 32 female) COVID-19-infected patients admitted to the intensive care unit were reviewed. Associations between the test results and COVID-19 infection outcomes (discharged [DC] or passed away [PA]) were measured. Results: The results of the current study demonstrate overall significant differences in CBC parameters between PA group as compared to DC group (P < 0.05). The PA group had a significantly elevated MPR (10.15±12.16 vs 4.04±1.5; P < 0.01) and NLR (18.29±19.82 vs 7.35±9.68; P < 0.01) as compared to the DC group, suggesting an association between these parameters and mortality. Odds ratios analysis also showed that adjustment for demographic variables and comorbidities did not weaken the observed association. Conclusion: Elevated MPR and NLR are associated with poor prognosis in COVID-19 patients and could be useful as therapy management indicators.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mobarki, A. A., Dobie, G., Saboor, M., Madkhali, A. M., Akhter, M. S., Hakamy, A., … Hamali, H. A. (2021). Mpr and nlr as prognostic markers in icu-admitted patients with covid-19 in jazan, saudi arabia. Infection and Drug Resistance, 14, 4859–4864. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S342259

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free