Voting, contagion and the trade-off between public health and political rights: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian 2020 polls

0Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Natural disasters raise challenging trade-offs between public health safety and inalienable rights like the active involvement in political choices through voting. We exploit a quasi-experimental setting provided by multiple ballots across regions and municipalities during the Italian 2020 elections to estimate the effect of voters’ turnout on the spread of COVID-19. By employing an event-study design with a two-stage Control Function strategy, we find that post-poll new COVID infections increased by an average of 1.1% for each additional percentage point of turnout. Based on these estimates and real political events, we also show through a simulation that in-person voting during a high-infection regime may have a large impact on public health outcomes, more than doubling new infections, deaths and hospitalizations. These findings suggest that policy-makers’ responses to natural disasters should be flexible and contingent to the emergency severity, in order to minimize social costs for citizens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mello, M., & Moscelli, G. (2022). Voting, contagion and the trade-off between public health and political rights: Quasi-experimental evidence from the Italian 2020 polls. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 200, 1025–1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2022.07.008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free