Charcot's paradox

6Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Jean-Martin Charcot (1825-1893), considered the father of modern neurology, had a particular interest in pathology and learned to value anatomical findings. Among his main contributions is the use of the anatomo-clinical method in neurology. Although described as cold and impatient in his interpersonal relations, Charcot had a great affection for animals. He had two dogs in his home, which he called Carlo and Sigurd, and a little monkey, Rosalie. Despite his fascination with neuropathology and anatomo-clinical correlations, Charcot disapproved of studies using animal species other than humans, a seemingly paradoxical attitude. As a result, Charcot's human studies resulted in important advances in neurology as, prior to his research, anatomical observations of animals were extrapolated to humans, leading to conceptual errors.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Silva, M. D. M. E., Meira, A. T., Walusinski, O., De Camargo, C. H. F., & Teive, H. A. G. (2019). Charcot’s paradox. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, 77(8), 590–593. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282X20190037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free