Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in diffuse pleural mesothelioma

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) versus chemotherapy on the prognosis of real-world diffuse pleural mesothelioma patients in China. Methods: Clinical data of 90 patients with diffuse pleural mesothelioma from 2019 to 2022 were collected from Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. Patients were divided into two groups: the ICIs-treated group (n = 46) and the chemotherapy-only group (n = 44). The efficacy and safety of immunotherapy relative to chemotherapy at different treatment stages were explored. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.0 and 7.0 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was 24.7 and 15.8 months in the ICIs-treated group and the chemotherapy group, respectively. The ICIs-treated group showed an 11% increase in objective response rate (ORR) (52.2% vs. 41.0%) and an 8.0% increase in disease control rate (DCR) (78.3% vs. 70.0%) compared to the chemotherapy group. The Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated significant PFS (HR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.38–0.98; p = 0.038) and OS (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.26–0.86; p = 0.011) benefits of receiving immunotherapy over chemotherapy alone. Subgroup analysis according to treatment timing showed the same trend. Conclusion: In patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma, immunotherapy achieved better survival benefits compared to chemotherapy in both first- and second-/third-line treatments. The early addition of immunotherapy improved survival in patients with nonsurgical diffuse pleural mesothelioma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, X., Chang, L., Ma, Q., Zhang, Q., Xu, W., & Li, Q. (2024). Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors versus chemotherapy alone in diffuse pleural mesothelioma. Thoracic Cancer, 15(20), 1590–1597. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.15386

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free