Boundaries and things. A metaphysical study of the brentano-chisholm theory

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The fact that boundaries are ontologically dependent entities is agreed by Franz Brentano and Roderick Chisholm. This article studies both authors as a single metaphysical account about boundaries. The Brentano-Chisholm theory understands that boundaries and the objects to which they belong hold a mutual relationship of ontological dependence: the existence of a boundary depends upon a continuum of higher spatial dimensionality, but also is a conditio sine qua non for the existence of a continuum. Although the view that ordinary material objects and their boundaries (or surfaces) ontologically depend on each other is correct, it does not grasp their asymmetric relationship: while the existence of a surface rigidly depends upon the existence of the very object it belongs to, the existence of a physical object generically depends upon having some surface. In modal terms, both are two kinds of de re ontological dependence that this article tries to distinguish.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Erices, G. N. (2019). Boundaries and things. A metaphysical study of the brentano-chisholm theory. Kriterion (Austria), 33(2), 15–48. https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2019-330203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free