Comparative efficacy of dabrafenib + trametinib versus treatment options for metastatic melanoma in first-line settings

5Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: The objective was to systematically review the literature and assess the relative efficacy of agents approved in first-line settings via network meta-Analysis. Materials methods: A literature review was conducted via searching different medical databases. The eligibility criteria included Phase II or III randomized controlled trials that had enrolled treatment-naive adult patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. Results: The network meta-Analysis results suggested that dabrafenib + trametinib significantly prolongs the survival outcomes compared with the monotherapies and had comparable efficacy profile compared with encorafenib + binimetinib and cobimetinib + vemurafenib. In comparison with immunotherapies, the results varied for progression-free survival and overall survival. Conclusion: Long-Term survival data of dabrafenib + trametinib establishes the combination as one of the preferred treatment options for previously untreated melanoma patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, J., Das, J., Kalra, M., & Ratto, B. (2021). Comparative efficacy of dabrafenib + trametinib versus treatment options for metastatic melanoma in first-line settings. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10(4), 267–280. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0249

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free