Predicting Recovery After Mild TBI

  • Booker J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

© Crown copyright 2019. INTRODUCTION: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (MTBI) is often treated as a homogenous group in current practice. Stratifying patients more accurately may result in the implementation of more effective, individualized treatment. We aimed to identify prognostic indicators of recovery 1-yr following MTBI. METHODS: Using a prospective, observational study design, a large MTBI population (N = 596) was recruited following admission to the Emergency Department. Data was collected at brain injury clinics between August 2011 and July 2015. Functional recovery at 1-yr was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE). RESULTS: A follow-up rate of 92% was achieved. The most common aetiologies of MTBI were falls (n = 222) and road traffic collisions (n = 154). Distribution of Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was 15 (n = 363), 14 (n = 156) and 13 (n = 77). Multiordinal logistic regression of the GOSE found that psychiatric history (P < .001), alcohol intoxication (P = .011), assault (P = .022) and GCS <15 (P = < .001), led to worse outcome. An abnormal CT scan was not a predictor of functional recovery. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that after MTBI, patients with previous psychiatric history, GCS <15, aetiology of assault and alcohol intoxication result in worse long-term outcomes. Future work into developing a full prognostic model for MTBI may help to tailor individual treatment and improve long-term outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Booker, J. (2019). Predicting Recovery After Mild TBI. Neurosurgery, 84(5), E274–E274. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz001.nt1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free