Security threat versus aggregated truths: Ethical issues in the use of neuroscience and neurotechnology for national security

4Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter explores uses of brain science for purposes of national security intelligence and defense, discusses the neuroethical issues that these approaches foster, and posits ways that such ethical concerns can be addressed. The chapter begins with a historical overview of military attempts to employ the tools and techniques of brain and cognitive science, and illustrates ethical problems generated by these attempts. It then focuses on the ways that ethical systems and approaches might be utilized or limited in neuroscience and neurotechnology for military and security operations. With recognition of the global trends and the power dynamics that such scientific capacity can yield, the chapter emphasizes the importance of neuroethical preparedness and provides a novel paradigm for neuroethical risk assessment and mitigation. The authors of this chapter offer their insights through their perspectives as American scholars engaged not only in American issues, but as scholars engaged through collaboration and cooperation on the global stage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tennison, M. N., Giordano, J., & Moreno, J. D. (2017). Security threat versus aggregated truths: Ethical issues in the use of neuroscience and neurotechnology for national security. In Neuroethics: Anticipating the Future (pp. 531–553). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198786832.003.0027

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free