Comparative coronary vascular reactivity and hemodynamics during halothane and isoflurane anesthesia in swine

Abstract

To assess the dose-response effects of isoflurane and halothane anesthesia on hemodynamics and coronary artery reactivity, the authors studied myocardial hyperemic responses following brief single artery flow arrests in 21 open chest, isocapnic swine in which arterial blood pressures and cardiac outputs were recorded. A specially designed Doppler probe was used to measure the peak and time course of coronary blood flow velocity in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) after 15-s LAD occlusions. The ratio of peak velocity of blood flow to resting velocity (coronary reserve), relative repayment of flow debt, and duration of hyperemic responses were studied. Surgery was performed at MAC endtidal concentrations ([Et](isoflurane)=1.45%. [Et](halothane)=1.25% of isoflurane (n=7) or halothane (n=7), and recordings were made after 15-min steady state [Et](agent) at 0.5, 1, 1.25, 1.5, 1.75, 2 MAC, and further 0.5 MAC increments until the demise of each animal. To compare coronary reactivity at similar coronary pressures, an aortic snare was used to elevate arterial pressures in a third group of halothane anesthesized pigs (n=7) to those in the previously studied isoflurane group at each MAC level. There were three major differences between halothane and isoflurane. First, cardiac depression (reduction in arterial pressure, cardiac output, and stroke volume) was less with isoflurane compared with halothane anesthesia. Second, with halothane anesthesia, there was a marked decrease in coronary reactivity independent of coronary perfusion pressures with marked, dose-dependent reductions in both coronary reserve and relative flow repayment. During isoflurane anesthesia, coronary reactivity and coronary reserve was well preserved within physiologic limits up to 1.75 MAC [Et]. Third, halothane anesthesized pigs died in cardiac collapse at much lower agent concentrations than with isoflurane (no animals survived 1.75 MAC halothane, whereas all animals survived 2.5 MAC isoflurane). Therefore, pigs anesthesized with isoflurane had greater coronary reserve, better preserved cardiac function, and greater tolerance to increasing agent concentration than pigs anesthesized with halothane.