Combining biochemical and ultrasonographic markers in predicting preeclampsia: A systematic review

111Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early identification of pregnant women at risk for preeclampsia is a priority to implement preventive measures. Some biochemical and ultrasonographic parameters have shown promising predictive performance, but so far there is no clinically validated screening procedure. CONTENT: Using a series of keywords, we reviewed electronic databases (Medline, Embase, all records to May 2009) reporting the performance of biological and ultrasonographic markers to predict preeclampsia, both single markers and combinations of markers. We analyzed the data according to gestational age and risk levels of the studied populations. We evaluated the methodological quality of included publications using QUADAS (quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies). We identified 37 relevant studies that assessed 71 different combinations of biochemical and ultrasonographic markers. Most studies were performed during the second trimester on small-scale high-risk populations with few cases of preeclampsia. Combinations of markers generally led to an increase in sensitivity and/or specificity compared with single markers. In low-risk populations, combinations including placental protein 13 (PP13), pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A), a disintegrin and metalloprotease-12 (ADAM12), activin A, or inhibin Ameasured in first or early second trimester and uterine artery Doppler in second trimester appear promising (sensitivity 60%-80%, specificity >80%). In high-risk populations, the combination of PP13 and pulsatility index in first trimester showed 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity in a single study limited to severe preeclampsia. SUMMARY: Combinations of biochemical and ultrasonographic markers improved the performance of early prediction of preeclampsia. From a perspective of integrative medicine, large population-based studies evaluating algorithms combining multiple markers are needed, if screening approaches are to be eventually implemented. © 2009 American Association for Clinical Chemistry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giguère, Y., Charland, M., Bujold, E., Bernard, N., Grenier, S., Rousseau, F., … Forest, J. C. (2010, March 1). Combining biochemical and ultrasonographic markers in predicting preeclampsia: A systematic review. Clinical Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.134080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free