Of Testing and Treatment: Implications of Implementing New Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

14Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A novel, shorter-course regimen for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis was recently recommended by the World Health Organization. However, the most appropriate use of drug susceptibility testing (DST) to support this regimen is less clear. Implementing countries must therefore often choose between using a standardized regimen despite high levels of underlying drug resistance or require more stringent DST prior to treatment initiation. The former carries a high likelihood of exposing patients to de facto monotherapy with a critical drug class (fluoroquinolones), whereas the latter could exclude large groups of patients from their most effective treatment option. We discuss the implications of this dilemma and argue for an approach that will integrate DST into the delivery of any novel antimicrobial regimen, without excessively stringent requirements. Such guidance could make the novel MDR tuberculosis regimen available to most patients while reducing the risk of generating additional drug resistance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowdy, D. W., Theron, G., Tornheim, J. A., Warren, R., & Kendall, E. A. (2017). Of Testing and Treatment: Implications of Implementing New Regimens for Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 65(7), 1206–1211. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix486

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free