Remote ischemic preconditioning neither improves survival nor reduces myocardial or kidney injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

6Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Peri-interventional myocardial injury occurs frequently during transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). We assessed the effect of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) on myocardial injury, acute kidney injury (AKIN) and 6-month mortality in patients undergoing TAVI. Methods: We performed a prospective single-center controlled trial. Sixty-six patients treated with RIPC prior to TAVI were enrolled in the study and were matched to a control group by propensity-score. RIPC was applied to the upper extremity using a conventional tourniquet. Myocardial injury was assessed using high-sensitive troponin-T (hsTnT), and kidney injury was assessed using serum creatinine levels. Data were compared with the Wilcoxon-Rank and McNemar tests. Mortality was analysed with the log-rank test. Results: TAVI led to a significant rise of hsTnT across all patients (p < 0.001). No significant inter-group difference in maximum troponin release or areas-under-the-curve was detected. Medtronic CoreValve and Edwards Sapien valves showed similar peri-interventional troponin kinetics and patients receiving neither valve did benefit from RIPC. AKIN occurred in one RIPC patient and four non-RIPC patients (p = 0.250). No significant difference in 6-month mortality was observed. No adverse events related to RIPC were recorded. Conclusion: Our data do not show a beneficial role of RIPC in TAVI patients for cardio-or renoprotection, or improved survival.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Flechsig, M., Ruf, T. F., Troeger, W., Wiedemann, S., Quick, S., Ibrahim, K., … Heidrich, F. M. (2020). Remote ischemic preconditioning neither improves survival nor reduces myocardial or kidney injury in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9010160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free