Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer

273Citations
Citations of this article
167Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and laparoscopic or robotic minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (MIRP) are costlier alternatives to three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) and open radical prostatectomy for treating prostate cancer. We assessed temporal trends in their utilization and their impact on national health care spending. Methods Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked data, we determined treatment patterns for 45,636 men age≥65 years who received definitive surgery or radiation for localized prostate cancer diagnosed from 2002 to 2005. Costs attributable to prostate cancer care were the difference in Medicare payments in the year after versus the year before diagnosis. Results Patients received surgery (26%), external RT (38%), or brachytherapy with or without RT (36%). Among surgical patients, MIRP utilization increased substantially (1.5% among 2002 diagnoses v 28.7% among 2005 diagnoses, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nguyen, P. L., Gu, X., Lipsitz, S. R., Choueiri, T. K., Choi, W. W., Lei, Y., … Hu, J. C. (2011). Cost implications of the rapid adoption of newer technologies for treating prostate cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 29(12), 1517–1524. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1217

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free