A comparison of methods for bootstrapping in the local level model

11Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Bootstrap in time series models is not straightforward to implement, as in this case the observations are not independent. One of the alternatives is to bootstrap the residuals in order to obtain the bootstrap series and thus use these series for inference purposes. This work deals with the problem of assessing the accuracy of hyperparameters in structural models. We study the simplest case, the local level model, where the hyperparameters are given by the variances of the disturbance terms. As their distribution is not known, we employ the bootstrap to approximate the true distribution, using parametric and non-parametric approaches. Bootstrap standard deviations are computed and their performances compared to the asymptotic and empirical standard errors, calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation. We also build confidence intervals to the hyperparameters, using four bootstrap methods and the results are compared by means of the length, shape and coverage probabilities of the intervals. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franco, G. C., & Souza, R. C. (2002). A comparison of methods for bootstrapping in the local level model. Journal of Forecasting, 21(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.814

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free