Resistivity/porosity/velocity relationships from downhole logs: an aid for evaluating pore morphology

11Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Shows that although resistivity and velocity are controlled by porosity, the "connectiveness' of the solid phase (velocity) and fluid phase (resistivity) may be more important controls than porosity in these environments. Velocity logs in this environment are shown to be controlled primarily by the bulk properties of the solid fraction and fluid phases, with interparticle cementation causing significant increases in velocity during lithification. Downhole electrical resistivity logs, in contrast to velocity logs, are shown to respond to the fluid phase in these marine carbonate sediments, where the terrigenous clay fraction is small. Velocity and resistivity log responses are compared in different diagenetic carbonate environments. The effects of diagenetic processes in shallow-water reefal carbonates are contrasted with the effects of the normal compaction/lithification depth profile in carbonate-rich hemipelagic sediments. -from Authors

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jackson, P. D., Jarrard, R. D., Pigram, C. J., & Pearce, J. M. (1993). Resistivity/porosity/velocity relationships from downhole logs: an aid for evaluating pore morphology. Proc., Scientific Results, ODP Leg 133, Northeast Australian Margin, 661–686. https://doi.org/10.2973/odp.proc.sr.133.271.1993

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free