Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection

4Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Two studies demonstrate a technique that can clarify to what degree individual differences in perceived self-ingroup similarity reflect differences in projecting the self onto the group (self-anchoring) and/or introjecting the group onto the self (self-stereotyping). In preregistered Study 1 undergraduates described their values and those of fellow students. In Study 2 (a reanalysis of Denning & Hodges, 2022) citizens described their personalities and those of compatriots with similar voting preferences. Across both studies, ingroup identification predicted perceived self-ingroup similarity. Decomposing each participant’s self-ratings and ingroup-stereotype-ratings into normative (average) and distinctive (non-normative) profiles suggested this was primarily attributable to projecting the self-concept onto the group, but in Study 2's intergroup conflict situation perhaps also attributable to ingroup enhancement and introjecting ingroup-stereotypes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Locke, K. D. (2023). Group identification and perceived self-group similarity: differentiating projection from introjection. Self and Identity, 22(6), 1027–1051. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2023.2244723

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free