2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate, Methyl Methacrylate and Ethyl Acrylate Sensitisation: A 7-Year Retrospective Study

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Acrylates are increasingly common contact allergens; sensitisation is frequently associated with nail products. No prior study has been found in the European literature in which both methyl methacrylate (MMA) and ethyl acrylate (EA), in addition to 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (2-HEMA) were included in the standard baseline series. Objectives: To investigate the prevalence and characteristics of 2-HEMA, MMA and EA sensitisation at a university centre in Hungary. Methods: This retrospective study included 2005 consecutive patients who underwent patch testing between 2018 and 2024 with the European baseline series (EBS) extended with 2-HEMA (in 2018), MMA and EA. Results: Out of the tested 2005 patients, 74 (3.7%) were positive for at least one of the three acrylates; among them 86.5% were women. Mostly the hands (70.3%) and the face (24.3%) were symptomatic. Nail product exposure was significantly more frequent among younger patients. 20.3% of the acrylate-positive patients had no hypersensitivity to 2-HEMA, only to MMA and/or EA. Reactions to 2-HEMA and EA mostly appeared on D2, whereas MMA first reactions were predominantly on D7. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that testing MMA and EA in the EBS would be beneficial. Evaluating patch tests until the 7th day is essential.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jagodich, M., Németh, D., Tóth, A., Szalai, Z. Z., & Pónyai, G. (2026). 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate, Methyl Methacrylate and Ethyl Acrylate Sensitisation: A 7-Year Retrospective Study. Contact Dermatitis, 94(2), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/cod.70054

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free