Integrating Empirical and Participatory Approaches for Soil Erosion Assessment: A Comparative Study of USLE and AHP in Upland Central Vietnam

Abstract

Soil erosion threatens agricultural sustainability in tropical upland areas. This study evaluated soil erosion in Nam Dong district, Central Vietnam, using the Universal Soil Loss Equation (USLE) model and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) based on local stakeholder input. The USLE employed spatial data on rainfall, soil, topography, and land cover, while the AHP incorporated the perspectives of nine diverse community members. Both models identified the mountainous central region as most at risk; the USLE classified 62% of land as extreme erosion, whereas the AHP classified 82% as severe. These differences reflect the empirical approach of USLE versus the perception-driven results of the AHP. The study found that applying both methods independently and comparing their outcomes can yield different soil erosion scenarios. Furthermore, additional research is recommended to explore the use of the AHP as a tool for calibrating the relative importance of input factors in the USLE model. This approach could enhance the accuracy of soil erosion risk assessments and support more effectively targeted conservation strategies in complex upland landscapes.