The “Islamized Stranger”: On “Chronic” Versus “Contextual” Salience in the Measurement of Anti-Muslim Prejudice

18Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate whether anti-Muslim prejudice in Western countries is more widespread than prejudice towards other ethno-cultural groups or general ethnic prejudice. Previous research used different methodologies and yielded contradictory results. In this article, we combine a population-based split-sample survey experiment (N = 1,323), where half of the respondents judged items about Muslims and the other half statements about strangers, with an open question probing which groups respondents thought of when thinking about “strangers.” We furthermore extend previous research by not only focusing on general ethnic prejudice, but to differentiate between perceived trustworthiness, economic, cultural, and security threat. Our results strongly support the idea that the difference between the “chronic” and “contextual” salience of the target of prejudice should be taken into account.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Spruyt, B., & van der Noll, J. (2017). The “Islamized Stranger”: On “Chronic” Versus “Contextual” Salience in the Measurement of Anti-Muslim Prejudice. Political Psychology, 38(6), 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12383

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free