Cardiovascular Health Promotion in the Schools

  • Hayman L
  • Williams C
  • Daniels S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Landmark developments during the second half of the 20th century established that smoking, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia constituted cardinal risk factors for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.1 These insights proved critical in reversing decades of increases in the mortality rate from coronary heart disease in the United States starting in the late 1960s. As knowledge concerning the pathogenesis and pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease evolved rapidly during ensuing decades, research tended to focus on how much risk for adverse cardiovascular events increased in function of levels of risk factors (high-risk emphasis). However, this paradigm has shifted as research increasingly emphasized that low-risk cardiovascular risk factor profiles were associated with large reductions in cardiovascular mortality and improvements in other outcomes (low-risk emphasis).2 Thus, the conceptual framework for preventing cardiovascular disease that had been anchored largely in primary prevention increasingly embraced primordial prevention.3 Article see p 1971 In 2010, the American Heart Association released a set of 7 cardiovascular health metrics for adults and children that put cardiovascular health, as opposed to cardiovascular disease, front and center.4 These metrics were divided into 4 health behaviors (smoking, weight, physical activity, and diet) and 3 health factors (blood pressure, total cholesterol, and glycemia). For each health metric, 3 levels of cardiovascular health were defined: poor, intermediate, and ideal cardiovascular health. Although the choice of the metrics and the definition of levels of cardiovascular health for each metric rested on sound science, the utility of these metrics when combined into an index had not been previously tested. Recent studies have substantiated the AHA cardiovascular health metrics in adults.5,6 Hitherto, information about the utility of these metrics in children and adolescents was lacking. In this issue of Circulation , Laitinen and colleagues7 report the results of a study that examined the …

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hayman, L. L., Williams, C. L., Daniels, S. R., Steinberger, J., Paridon, S., Dennison, B. A., & McCrindle, B. W. (2004). Cardiovascular Health Promotion in the Schools. Circulation, 110(15), 2266–2275. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.0000141117.85384.64

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free