Concurrent processes: The affect-cognition relationship within the context of the "mere exposure" phenomenon

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The affect-cognition relationship and Zajonc's (1968) "mere exposure" hypothesis were examined in two studies that involved ratings of: (1) preference and familiarity for geometric forms previously scaled for complexity and (2) preference or height and familiarity for male yearbook pictures previously scaled for attractiveness or height. Two exceptions to his hypothesis were noted: simple geometric forms and unattractive faces showed satiation, and faces seen once before were rated more attractive than both novel faces and faces seen twice before. Moreover, mere exposure effects were noted with a nonaffective dimension (height). The major finding was that presentation frequency generally manifested independent relations to affect and rated familiarity, as well as to height and rated familiarity, therefore evoking a concurrent response process Eriksen, 1960). © 1993 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, M. A., Sundberg, J. L., & Bernstein, I. H. (1993). Concurrent processes: The affect-cognition relationship within the context of the “mere exposure” phenomenon. Perception & Psychophysics, 54(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206935

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free