Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies

47Citations
Citations of this article
132Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The goal to noninvasively detect fetal aneuploidies using circulating cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma seems to be achieved by the use of massively parallel sequencing (MPS). To date, different MPS approaches exist, all aiming to deliver reliable results in a cost effective manner. The most widely used approach is the whole genome MPS method, in which sequencing is performed on maternal plasma to determine the presence of a fetal trisomy. To reduce costs targeted approaches, only analyzing loci from the chromosome(s) of interest has been developed. This review summarizes the different MPS approaches, their benefits and limitations and discusses the implications for future noninvasive prenatal testing. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Boon, E. M. J., & Faas, B. H. W. (2013, June). Benefits and limitations of whole genome versus targeted approaches for noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidies. Prenatal Diagnosis. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4111

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free