Errata: Resolution in the ApoTome and the confocal laser scanning microscope: comparison

  • Weigel A
  • Schild D
  • Zeug A
35Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The essential feature of the confocal laser scanning microscope (cLSM) is the generation of optical sections by the removal of out-of-focus light. About ten years ago, structured illumination microscopy (SIM) was introduced as an alternative method for obtaining optical sections from biological specimens. Here we compare the resolution of the ApoTome (commercial SIM by Zeiss) to that achieved by a cLSM (Zeiss LSM 510). If fluorescent beads are used as test objects, then the ApoTome will achieve a lower axial resolution than the cLSM. In contrast to that, its lateral resolution scores slightly better. If subresolution homogeneous fluorescent layers are used as test objects, then the ApoTome will achieve a higher axial resolution than the cLSM. The ApoTome's axial resolution is homogeneous over the field-of-view while that of the cLSM changes markedly. Finally, the anisotropy of the ApoTome's resolution was found to be negligible for standard applications while its capability to resolve fine structures within stained tissue slices is limited to one or two cell layers and thus worse than in the cLSM.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weigel, A., Schild, D., & Zeug, A. (2011). Errata: Resolution in the ApoTome and the confocal laser scanning microscope: comparison. Journal of Biomedical Optics, 16(4), 049801. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3585832

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free