Early intervention, IDEA part C services, and the medical home: Collaboration for best practice and best outcomes

146Citations
Citations of this article
255Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The medical home and the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Part C Early Intervention Program share many common purposes for infants and children ages 0 to 3 years, not the least of which is a familycentered focus. Professionals in pediatric medical home practices see substantial numbers of infants and toddlers with developmental delays and/or complex chronic conditions. Economic, health, and familyfocused data each underscore the critical role of timely referral for relationship-based, individualized, accessible early intervention services and the need for collaborative partnerships in care. The medical home process and Individuals With Disabilities Education Act Part C policy both support nurturing relationships and family-centered care; both offer clear value in terms of economic and health outcomes. Best practice models for early intervention services incorporate learning in the natural environment and coaching models. Proactive medical homes provide strategies for effective developmental surveillance, family-centered resources, and tools to support high-risk groups, and comanagement of infants with special health care needs, including the monitoring of services provided and outcomes achieved. © 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adams, R. C., Tapia, C., Murphy, N. A., Norwood, K. W., Burke, R. T., Friedman, S. L., … Mucha, S. (2013). Early intervention, IDEA part C services, and the medical home: Collaboration for best practice and best outcomes. Pediatrics, 132(4). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free