Falsification Test of The National Resilience Concept as Indonesian Geostrategic Doctrine

  • Priyono J
  • Herman H
  • Yusgiantoro P
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aims to prove the truth of national resilence concept by using deductive phenomenological interpretive qualitative methods with epistemology of geostrategy as a main objective. Popper’s falsification test is intended to gather evidence on which the geostrategic peripheral is applied to the national resilience concept, rather than reject the conception. The required data includes the national resilience concept and an epistemology of geostrategy to explain geostrategic realities in a sistematic hierarchy, using historical documents, scientific publications and also interviews. This study has shown that the national resilience concept sits outside the geostrategic periphery, despite some evidence of geostrategic validity. The evidence indicating the applicability of geostrategy includes (1) Formulation of national objectives and; (2) Consideration of geography and geopolitical conditions

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Priyono, J., Herman, H., & Yusgiantoro, P. (2017). Falsification Test of The National Resilience Concept as Indonesian Geostrategic Doctrine. Jurnal Pertahanan, 3(2), 123. https://doi.org/10.33172/jp.v3i2.216

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free