The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: A survival analysis

139Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Clinical guidelines should be updated to maintain their validity. Our aim was to estimate the length of time before recommendations become outdated. Methods: We used a retrospective cohort design and included recommendations from clinical guidelines developed in the Spanish National Health System clinical guideline program since 2008. We performed a descriptive analysis of references, recommendations and resources used, and a survival analysis of recommendations using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We included 113 recommendations from 4 clinical guidelines with a median of 4 years since the most recent search (range 3.9-4.4 yr). We retrieved 39 136 references (range 3343-14 787) using an exhaustive literature search, 668 of which were related to the recommendations in our sample. We identified 69 (10.3%) key references, corresponding to 25 (22.1%) recommendations that required updating. Ninety-two percent (95% confidence interval 86.9-97.0) of the recommendations were valid 1 year after their development. This probability decreased at 2 (85.7%), 3 (81.3%) and 4 years (77.8%). Interpretation: Recommendations quickly become outdated, with 1 out of 5 recommendations being out of date after 3 years. Waiting more than 3 years to review a guideline is potentially too long.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martínez García, L., Sanabria, A. J., García Álvarez, E., Trujillo-Martín, M. M., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, I., Kotzeva, A., … Alonso-Coello, P. (2014). The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: A survival analysis. CMAJ, 186(16), 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140547

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free