Abstract
Background: Clinical guidelines should be updated to maintain their validity. Our aim was to estimate the length of time before recommendations become outdated. Methods: We used a retrospective cohort design and included recommendations from clinical guidelines developed in the Spanish National Health System clinical guideline program since 2008. We performed a descriptive analysis of references, recommendations and resources used, and a survival analysis of recommendations using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We included 113 recommendations from 4 clinical guidelines with a median of 4 years since the most recent search (range 3.9-4.4 yr). We retrieved 39 136 references (range 3343-14 787) using an exhaustive literature search, 668 of which were related to the recommendations in our sample. We identified 69 (10.3%) key references, corresponding to 25 (22.1%) recommendations that required updating. Ninety-two percent (95% confidence interval 86.9-97.0) of the recommendations were valid 1 year after their development. This probability decreased at 2 (85.7%), 3 (81.3%) and 4 years (77.8%). Interpretation: Recommendations quickly become outdated, with 1 out of 5 recommendations being out of date after 3 years. Waiting more than 3 years to review a guideline is potentially too long.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Martínez García, L., Sanabria, A. J., García Álvarez, E., Trujillo-Martín, M. M., Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, I., Kotzeva, A., … Alonso-Coello, P. (2014). The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: A survival analysis. CMAJ, 186(16), 1211–1219. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.140547
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.