Neuroethics: The pursuit of transforming medical ethics in scientific ethics

11Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Ethical problems resulting from brain research have given rise to a new discipline termed neuroethics, representing a new kind of knowledge capable of discovering the neural basis for universal ethics. The article (1) tries to evaluate the contributions of neuroethics to medical ethics and its suitability to outline the foundations of universal ethics, (2) critically analyses the process of founding this universal ethic. The potential benefits of applying neuroimaging, psychopharmacology and neurotechnology have to be carefully weighed against their potential harm. In view of these questions, an intensive dialogue between neuroscience and the humanities is more necessary than ever.

References Powered by Scopus

Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will in voluntary action

1496Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

On the relation between brain potentials and the awareness of voluntary movements

489Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Neuroethics for the new millenium

335Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A four-part working bibliography of neuroethics: Part 4 - Ethical issues in clinical and social applications of neuroscience

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A call for establishing a public policy for mitigating the effects of dementia on modern workplaces

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Primum non nocere or primum facere meliorem? Hacking the brain in the 21st century

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Figueroa, G. (2016, February 20). Neuroethics: The pursuit of transforming medical ethics in scientific ethics. Biological Research. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-016-0070-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

16%

Researcher 2

11%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

41%

Neuroscience 4

24%

Social Sciences 3

18%

Psychology 3

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
Blog Mentions: 1
News Mentions: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 55

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free