An Empirical Comparison of Some Nightmare Dispositions: Neuroticism, Nightmare Proneness, Thin Psychological Boundaries, and Sensory Processing Sensitivity

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previous research and theory have identified several dispositions for experiencing frequent nightmares, but these dispositions are rarely examined simultaneously. This study compared the relative strength of these dispositions in predicting nightmare frequency. A sample of 116 university students completed measures of nightmare frequency, neuroticism, nightmare proneness, thin psychological boundaries, and sensory processing sensitivity. After accounting for sociodemographic variables and dream recall frequency, only nightmare proneness and thin boundaries significantly independently predicted nightmare frequency. These findings highlight the importance of nightmare proneness and thin boundaries as predictors, underscoring the need for further research with diverse samples to better understand these relationships. Limitations and future research directions are also discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, W. E., & Mathe, J. R. (2024). An Empirical Comparison of Some Nightmare Dispositions: Neuroticism, Nightmare Proneness, Thin Psychological Boundaries, and Sensory Processing Sensitivity. Dreaming, 35(2), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/drm0000294

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free