Borders, Asylum and Global Non-Citizenship

  • Johnson H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The experience of border crossing for refugees and irregular migrants challenges global border and migration controls in multiple contexts. Using qualitative field research in Tanzania, Spain, Morocco and Australia, Heather Johnson asks how a global regime of migration management and control can be perceived through the dynamics of particular border spaces: refugee camps, border zones and detention centres. She explores how irregular migrants are impacted by the increasingly security-oriented practices of border control, and how they confront these practices. Johnson rejects the characterization of border spaces as exceptional, abject and exclusionary, arguing instead for an understanding of politics as everyday contestation that reveals a radical political agency, re-imagining the global non-citizen as a transgressive and powerful figure. Building on recent scholarship that rethinks irregularity and non-citizenship, her conclusions have broad implications for how we understand irregular migration from a position of dialogue and solidarity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johnson, H. L. (2014). Borders, Asylum and Global Non-Citizenship. Borders, Asylum and Global Non-Citizenship. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781107449404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free