Are UK primary care teams formally identifying patients for palliative care before they die?

Abstract

Background: The palliative care approach has the potential to improve care for patients with progressive life-threatening illnesses from the time of diagnosis. Policy and clinical directives in the UK advocate early identification. Aim: To determine the extent to which practices identify patients for palliative care, including factors influencing early identification and possible effects on place of death. Design and setting: Qualitative and quantitative data were collected fromsix general practices from three Scottish NHS boards and analysed. Method: Records of patients who had died in the previous 6months were analysed and interviews with practice staff (n = 21) and with patients currently on the practice palliative care register and bereaved relatives (n = 14) were conducted. In addition, a practice meeting was observed. Results: In total, 29%of patients who died were recorded as being on the practice palliative care register before death. Two-thirds of patients with cancer were recorded on the register, but for those with non-malignant conditions only around 20%had any palliative care documented. This was a result of GPs not finding the current guidelines useful and being reluctant to discuss palliative care overtly with patients early in their illness. Palliative care services and documentation were geared towards patients with cancer. More district nurses than GPs saw the benefits of inclusion on the palliative care register. Only 25% of patients on the register died in hospital. Conclusion: Most patients with advanced progressive illnesses, especially those with non-malignant disease, are not being formally identified for a palliative care approach before they die. Those identified aremore likely to benefit from coordinated care andmay bemore likely to die at home. ©British Journal of General Practice.