Family health strategy and equity in prenatal care: A population based cross-sectional study in Minas Gerais, Brazil

5Citations
Citations of this article
121Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Prenatal care coverage is still not universal or adequately provided in many low and middle income countries. One of the main barriers regards the presence of socioeconomic inequalities in prenatal care utilization. In Brazil, prenatal care is supplied for the entire population at the community level as part of the Family Health Strategy (FHS), which is the main source of primary care provided by the public health system. Brazil has some of the greatest income inequalities in the world, and little research has been conducted to investigate prenatal care utilization of FHS across socioeconomic groups. This paper addresses this gap investigating the socioeconomic and regional differences in the utilization of prenatal care supplied by the FHS in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Methods: Data comes from a probabilistic household survey carried out in 2012 representative of the population living in urban areas in the state of Minas Gerais. The sample size comprises 1,420 women aged between 13 and 45 years old who had completed a pregnancy with a live born in the last five years prior to the survey. The outcome variables are received prenatal care, number of antenatal visits, late prenatal care, antenatal tests, tetanus immunization and low birthweight. A descriptive analysis and logistic models were estimated for the outcome variables. Results: The coverage of prenatal care is almost universal in catchment urban areas of FHT of Minas Gerais state including both antenatal visits and diagnostic procedures. Due to this high level of coverage, socioeconomic inequalities were not observed. FHS supplied care for around 80% of the women without private insurance and 90% for women belonging to lower socioeconomic classes. Women belonging to lower socioeconomic classes were at least five times more likely to receive antenatal visits and any of the antenatal tests by the FHS compared to those belonging to the highest classes. Moreover, FHS was effective in reducing low birthweight. Women who had prenatal care through FHS were 40% less likely to have a child with low birthweight. Conclusion: This paper presents strong evidence that FHS promotes equity in antenatal care in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

References Powered by Scopus

Evidence-based, cost-effective interventions: How many newborn babies can we save?

1198Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors affecting the utilization of antenatal care in developing countries: Systematic review of the literature

609Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

How effective is antenatal care in preventing maternal mortality and serious morbidity? An overview of the evidence

375Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Vaccine equity in low and middle income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

81Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Association of Conditional Cash Transfers with Maternal Mortality Using the 100 Million Brazilian Cohort

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Sus in the lives of brazilians: Care, accessibility, and equity in the daily life of primary health care users

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andrade, M. V., Noronha, K. V. M. D. S., Queiroz Barbosa, A. C., Souza, M. N., Calazans, J. A., Carvalho, L. R. D., … Silva, N. C. (2017). Family health strategy and equity in prenatal care: A population based cross-sectional study in Minas Gerais, Brazil. International Journal for Equity in Health, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0503-9

Readers over time

‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2507142128

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

66%

Researcher 15

26%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 23

48%

Nursing and Health Professions 13

27%

Social Sciences 7

15%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 5

10%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 21

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0