Rethinking the Terminology: A Perspective on Renaming Polycystic Ovary Syndrome for an Enhanced Pathophysiological Understanding

5Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a complex endocrine disorder that affects women at various stages of life, presenting a wide range of symptoms and health implications. The term “Polycystic Ovary Syndrome” can be misleading, prompting many within the medical community and advocacy groups to advocate for a name change. Critics argue that this terminology can complicate understanding and awareness of the disease among patients. The primary concern is that PCOS emphasizes the ovarian aspect, fostering the misconception that PCOS is merely a gynecological disorder. In reality, PCOS impacts multiple organ systems, particularly metabolic health. Patients frequently experience insulin resistance, weight gain, irregular menstrual cycles, and hirsutism—symptoms that extend beyond ovarian dysfunction. In light of these issues, there is increasing support for renaming PCOS to better reflect its systemic implications and minimize confusion. The current name may hinder understanding and potentially lead to inadequate disease management. Alternative names have been proposed, including “Ovarian Dysmetabolic Syndrome,” which our team supports, as well as “Metabolic Reproductive Syndrome” and “Hyperandrogenic Persistent Ovulatory Dysfunction Syndrome.” These alternatives aim to highlight the hormonal imbalances and metabolic disturbances associated with the condition, fostering inclusivity and reducing stigma for all affected individuals. This narrative review provides a historical overview of PCOS, tracing its recognition from early descriptions to contemporary guidelines. We discuss the evolving understanding of its pathophysiology and the rationale behind the proposed name change. By adopting a new nomenclature, we can enhance understanding among healthcare professionals, increase inclusivity for affected women, reduce the stigma and anxiety linked to the diagnosis, and offer a more accurate representation of the condition’s complex pathophysiology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Taieb, A., Asma, G., Jabeur, M., Fatma, B. A., Nassim, B. H. S., & Asma, B. A. (2024). Rethinking the Terminology: A Perspective on Renaming Polycystic Ovary Syndrome for an Enhanced Pathophysiological Understanding. Clinical Medicine Insights: Endocrinology and Diabetes, 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/11795514241296777

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free