Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Quick-Dash Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders

  • SALWA F. ABD EL-MAJIED, Ph.D. A
  • MAHA M. MOHAMMED, Ph.D.* N
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Upper Extremity Disorders (UEDs) are a common health problem, causing temporary and sometimes long-term work disability and implying considerable costs for employers and society. So, it is necessary to assess disability and symptoms in Egyptian patients with upper extremity disorders. Aim of Study: To examine the reliability and validity of the Arabic Shortened Version Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (Arabic Q-DASH) in UEDs. Material and Methods: Sixty-two patients with UEDs completed the Arabic Q-DASH questionnaire at the beginning of study and after 3 days without any intervention between the baseline and second administration. Internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's alpha; test-retest reliability was measured using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: Cronbach's alpha of the Arabic Q-DASH ques-tionnaire was high (Cronbach's alpha=0.88). Test-retest reli-ability was good (ICC: 0.84). Conclusions: The Arabic Q-DASH questionnaire is a reliable and valid upper extremity outcome measure for assessing patients with various upper extremity disorders, whose primary language is Arabic.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

SALWA F. ABD EL-MAJIED, Ph.D., A. S. M. K., M. Sc. ;, & MAHA M. MOHAMMED, Ph.D.*, N. M. A., Ph. D. ; (2020). Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Version of the Quick-Dash Questionnaire for Upper Extremity Disorders. The Medical Journal of Cairo University, 88(12), 2037–2043. https://doi.org/10.21608/mjcu.2020.125145

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free