Telecom responsibilization: Internet governance, surveillance, and new roles for intermediaries

7Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article foregrounds internet intermediaries as a class of actors central to many governance and surveillance strategies, and provides an overview of their emerging roles and responsibilities. While the growth of the internet has created challenges for state actors, state priorities have been unfolded onto the private institutions that provide many of the internet's services. This article elaborates responsibilization strategies implicating internet intermediaries, and the goals that these actors can be aligned toward. These include enrolling telecom service providers in law enforcement and national security-oriented surveillance programs, as well as strategies to responsibilize service providers as copyright enforcers. But state interests are also responsive to pressures from civil society, so that "internet values" are increasingly channelled through the formal political processes shaping internet governance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zajko, M. (2016). Telecom responsibilization: Internet governance, surveillance, and new roles for intermediaries. Canadian Journal of Communication, 41(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.22230/CJC2016V41N1A2894

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free