Abstract
In this paper I agree with both Ian Hacking and Victoria McGeer that the 'Theory of Mind' theory (ToM) is fundamentally flawed. However, I find reasons to reject both of their critiques of ToM as incoherent and instead build upon certain parts of McGeer's work to develop my own rejection of ToM. I end by suggesting routes this rejection might take the philosophy of psychology down.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
APA
Cull, M. (2014). Can the “theory of mind” hypothesis survive, given theoretical insights derived from the study of autism? A response to hacking and McGeer. Kriterion (Austria), 28, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2014-012805
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
Already have an account? Sign in
Sign up for free