Can the 'theory of mind' hypothesis survive, given theoretical insights derived from the study of autism? A response to hacking and McGeer

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper I agree with both Ian Hacking and Victoria McGeer that the 'Theory of Mind' theory (ToM) is fundamentally flawed. However, I find reasons to reject both of their critiques of ToM as incoherent and instead build upon certain parts of McGeer's work to develop my own rejection of ToM. I end by suggesting routes this rejection might take the philosophy of psychology down.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cull, M. (2014). Can the “theory of mind” hypothesis survive, given theoretical insights derived from the study of autism? A response to hacking and McGeer. Kriterion (Austria), 28, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1515/krt-2014-012805

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free