Ecological Fallacy and Covariates: New Insights based on Multilevel Modelling of Individual Data

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The paper provides a new and more explicit formulation of the assumptions needed by the ordinary ecological regression to provide unbiased estimates and clarifies why violations of these assumptions will affect any method of ecological inference. Empirical evidence is obtained by showing that estimates provided by three main ecological inference methods are heavily biased when compared with multilevel logistic regression applied to a unique set of individual data on voting behaviour. The main findings of our paper have two important implications that can be extended to all situations where the assumptions needed to apply ecological inference are violated in the data: (i) only ecological inference methods that allow one to model the effect of covariates have a chance to produce unbiased estimates, and (ii) there are certain data generating mechanisms producing a kind of bias in ecological estimates that cannot be corrected by modelling the effect of covariates.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gnaldi, M., Tomaselli, V., & Forcina, A. (2018). Ecological Fallacy and Covariates: New Insights based on Multilevel Modelling of Individual Data. International Statistical Review, 86(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/insr.12244

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free