Systemic Racism in Canadian Healthcare: A Policy and Equity Analysis

1Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: In Canadian healthcare, systemic racism subverts commitment to universal coverage by building inequities into the system of governance, regulation, and clinical practice. Although racial disparities have been documented, little attention has been paid to how institutional structures perpetuate these inequities. Objective: This study critically examines the organizational aspects of racism in the Canadian healthcare system. It aims to identify structural obstacles faced by racialized patients and foreign-trained physicians and to provide policy recommendations grounded in evidence. Methods: The authors employed a narrative review framework for qualitative analysis of documents. Public inquiries (eg, Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Viens Report), government audits (eg, PHAC and CHRC), case files (eg, Brian Sinclair, Joyce Echaquan, and Dr. Akinbiyi), and peer-reviewed publications between 2000 and 2024 were the data sources. Thematic coding occurs across 4 areas: (1) institutional discrimination, (2) licensing and workforce exclusion, (3) patient and cultural safety, and (4) accountability gaps. Results: The review found continuing institutional disregard for Indigenous and Black patients, and the disparities were most marked in emergency and maternal services. Internationally educated doctors face opaque and delayed credentialing procedures, which can exacerbate workforce disparities. Case examples illustrate how system failures, including disregarding patient suffering, ignoring cultural requirements, and inadequate oversight, can lead to harm. It is a recurring pattern in which the recommended action is not taken following a review, suggesting organizational resistance to change. Discussion: Canadian systemic racism in health care occurs through omissions (failure to act on reform) and commissions (institutional exclusion). To tackle this, it is necessary to entrench antiracism in legislation, make cultural safety training a requirement, collect race-disaggregated data, and transform licensing routes. Conclusion: Universal healthcare is not equitable unless systemic racism is eliminated. Systemic changes that recalibrate healthcare governance in accordance with antiracism and equity values are necessary to provide safe and inclusive care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adegoke, K., Adegoke, A., Dawodu, D., & Kayode, T. (2025). Systemic Racism in Canadian Healthcare: A Policy and Equity Analysis. Journal of Primary Care and Community Health, 16. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319251386672

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free