Detection of citrus huanglongbing-associated 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' in Citrus and Diaphorina citri in Pakistan, seasonal variability, and implications for disease management

51Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We report the detection of the huanglongbing (HLB)-associated bacterium 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' from both plants and insects in Pakistan and the seasonal variability in the numbers of 'Ca. L. asiaticus'- positive psyllid vector, Diaphorina citri. Our studies showed that 'Ca. L. asiaticus' was detectable from trees in areas with maximum temperatures reaching nearly 50°C (average maximum of 42°C). However, the bacterium was present at very low levels in psyllids both in summer (June to August) and autumn (September to November) in contrast to reports from Florida, where the bacterium was detectable at very high levels during October to November. We hypothesize that hot summer temperatures in Pakistan may interfere with acquisition and replication of 'Ca. L. asiaticus' in psyllids and may lead to dead or nontransmissible 'Ca. L. asiaticus' in plants. Psyllid counts were very low in both summer and winter, showed a population peak ('Ca. L. asiaticus'-positive vectors) in spring, and showed a larger peak ('Ca. L. asiaticus'-free psyllids) in autumn. Natural thermotherapy during hot summers and a low vector population during environmental extremes may have played a major role in longterm survival of the citrus industry in Pakistan. These results may be useful in developing management strategies for U.S. citrus industries in Texas and California. © 2014 The American Phytopathological Society.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Razi, M. F., Keremane, M. L., Ramadugu, C., Roose, M., Khan, I. A., & Lee, R. F. (2014). Detection of citrus huanglongbing-associated “Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus” in Citrus and Diaphorina citri in Pakistan, seasonal variability, and implications for disease management. Phytopathology, 104(3), 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-08-13-0224-R

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free